A few weeks ago I posted an article that advocated the
idea of WWE presenting one Money in the Bank match instead of two (read that here... if you like). My logic was
that one guy being able to cash-in on either champion would make unpredictable
television, allow WWE to present a single match packed with the best talent,
and make the Money in the Bank concept in general seem more prestigious.
We're getting the tried and tested two ladder matches
format. It has been altered a little though, which is nice to see. Last year
saw the ladder bout for the red (WWE championship) briefcase featured only
former WWE champions. This year that match has become the bout for former world
champions in general. The blue briefcase match will feature guys who have never
(with the exception of Jack Swagger) held either of WWE's two world titles.
For those who aren't sure who the more important
wrestlers are the red case match has been dubbed the All-Star match. The other
match features up-and-comers. Those aren't my words. No, those are the words of
Teddy Long (holla!). Yes, Teddy has made a seven man match and described the
entrants as up-and-comers even though only two have debuted in the last twelve
months and one has held the World Heavyweight championship before.
The other thing to note about the two matches is that one
exclusively features faces while the other exclusively features heels. It's an
interesting choice for WWE to have made. I imagine it was largely decided to do
an all heel match because the event's being held in Philadelphia, a city whose
fans will take in their stride an all bad guy battle. My assumption is that
they'll pick one or two guys to cheer as the match goes on. Some of the guys
may be booked sympathetically too, encouraging the audience to support them.
Fandango has been used as a pseudo face on this week's TV and has proven
popular in the past so he may be laying the blue eye on Sunday.
Both matches should be good, but i think the All-Star
match is likely to be the best. It will consist of CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, the
returning RVD, Sheamus, Christian, Kane and Randy Orton. Well, I say 'The Big
Red Machine' will be involved but he might not be: WWE are reporting that he
suffered injuries after being attacked by the Wyatt Family on RAW. He may miss
the event to sell that.
Bryan is an obvious guy to select as the winner. Over the
last several months he's been striving to prove his worth, first as part of
Team Hell No and then in his rivalry with Randy Orton. The natural progression
of this is for Bryan to defy the storyline odds and unhook the briefcase,
setting himself up to climb WWE's ultimate mountain: defeating John Cena for
the WWE championship.
Bryan is my pick to win. It's a combination of wanting to
see him enter the WWE title's orbit and the belief that Cena v Bryan is one of
the best feud WWE could offer fans this summer. Besides Punk v Lesnar (more on
which below) what other fresh matches and stars does WWE have access to?
They could do the feud without the briefcase or they
could simply not bother with it all together, which means 'The Dazzler' is not
the only option. Sheamus has been directionless for a while now. That's been a
rarity over the last eighteen months. He could easily be plucked from obscurity
to challenge for the WWE title. Cena v Sheamus is not a wholly fresh match but
it is one we've not seen for a while.
It could even give us a surprise 'Great
White' heel turn, not that I think that's likely. Speaking of which, a
briefcase victory for 'The Viper' could play into that heel turn he's been
rumoured to make for around a year. He could cash in, lose, and go nuts or
opportunistically take his match against a prone Cena like a true villain.
Either way it would set 'The Apex Predator' up as a bad guy.
Ultimately the MITB concept is one designed to favour wrestlers
that have yet to become truly ingrained headline personalities. That's another
reason I favour Bryan over Orton, Sheamus, and the rest.
The up-and-comers in the blue case battle will be Dean
Ambrose, Cody Rhodes, Damien Sandow, Jack Swagger, Antonio Cesaro, Wade
Barrett, and Faaaaaan... daaaaaan... goooooo. The best part of this match?
There's nobody that even resembles an obvious winner. Swagger and Fandango were
both in prime spots a couple of months ago but have lost momentum because of
injuries (an arm injury for Swags, a concussion for Fandango). Had they not
been forced to take a few weeks off either or both could be favoured. As things
are they seem as likely to win as everyone else.
As a member of The Shield Ambrose has been used well since
late last year and is now more of a singles guy than a trios guy but it feels
too soon for him to be close to the WHC. The Shield will likely split before
any of the three become that big.
Rhodes and Sandow have done nothing of note for months.
The flip-flopping on their split during the WrestleMania build hurt them both.
And Barrett and Cesaro both spent significant portions of the first half of the
year as mid-card champions who lost more often than they won.
Arguments could be made for any of the seven men being
potential winners. Most of them have been on the roster long enough to deserve
the chance to be a top guy and all of them would inject freshness into the
World title scene.
Of all the names involved I like Barrett's chances best.
He has a handy combination of having very little to do and tenure on the
roster. He'd be accepted in the role of 'Mr Money in the Bank' and world
champion. That he dropped the Intercontinental title at Payback could have been
WWE freeing him up for bigger things as much as anything else.
That's one busy ladder
I'm hopeful that this match will be a cut above the
average Ryback outing. He's shown in the past that he can have very good
matches with smaller, faster men who are better wrestlers than he is. If
they're given some time I think they'll have a very good night together.
Who'll win? The Ryback. This match seems designed to give
him his much needed first pay-per-view victory of the year. It could also see
Jericho written off TV too. He's got some Fozzy gigs coming up, y'see, and who
better to be credited with his disappearance than the company's resident
psychopathic musclehead?
Curtis Axel's first major title defence will be at MITB.
He'll face former two time champion The Miz. I can't see why Axel would lose
the belt after just four weeks so I expect a successful night for him. This
match is unlikely to he wonderful. Axel is good and has connected well with
crowds (Heyman's certainly helped in that regard) but 'The Awesome One' has
been treading water for a while now. Fans aren't into him as they were. I still
think he could be huge as a babyface but it's not something that can happen overnight.
The feud between Kaitlyn and AJ Lee, which had been
teased for well over a year but only started just over a month ago, had been
uninspiring until this week's TV rolled around. For too long it was basically
AJ and Kaitlyn dressing up as each other and causing distractions. RAW saw them
actually meet in a tag match and SmackDown on Friday will see the old contract
signing trope trotted out. It may not be new but at least the ladies are being
treated more seriously than they were.
I like both gals but this has been neither's finest hour.
With just a bit of work this could have been one of Money in the Bank's hottest
rivalries. Given some promo time and a remit to be a little more serious they
could have built up a story of a friendship gone bad. It's a shame WWE left it
so late to give them more to work with.
This isn't to say the match will be bad. I think it will
be at least good and probably better if they're given the time. Their meeting
at Payback was comfortably the best Divas match in some time. I expect AJ to
win. She's the most effective female performer on the roster. I can't see what
taking the title off of her would achieve.
The pre-show will feature one match (as is typical). Seth
Rollins and Roman Reigns defend the tag team titles against Jimmy and Jey Uso.
This is a wonderful example of why WWE should've spent a little more time on
the tag team scene before The Shield became champions. That one of the
promotion's best acts is wasting time on a pre-show wrestling against glorified
jobbers is very disappointing.
Don't expect the Usos to win. It will take a massive
disaster somewhere in WWE for them to ever be considered for a tag title reign.
World Heavyweight champion Alberto Del Rio will defend
against Dolph Ziggler. They'll have a tough job topping their excellent effort
at Payback, especially in terms of storytelling. It was one of the smoothest
plots to a wrestling match, in any company, that I've seen in a long time, and
the greatest double turn since WrestleMania 13.
I had mixed feelings on ADR as a babyface. On the one
hand he'd proven far better at it than I'd expected. He changed his facial
expressions and wrestling style really well and managed to portray himself as a
sincere individual (a not inconsiderable achievement). But on the other hand
Ricardo Rodriguez outstripped ADR in terms of popularity and the programme with
Jack Swagger had outstayed its welcome by the time it wrapped up.
Ziggler's turn had been building for a while. WWE's been
smart to keep him mostly apart from 'The Essence of Excellence' over the last
few weeks. It's made us keen for Ziggler to enact his revenge on the
unsportsmanlike champion. The mini feud with 3MB is neither here nor there, as
is the case with everything pertaining the 3MB. It was only meant to be a short
term thing to keep the Zigster occupied.
This match could be won by either guy. Winning the title
back would certainly help Ziggler's perception as a good guy that can be
believed in but a Del Rio win could set up another match between the two with
the same dynamic for SummerSlam. 'The Show Off's' size and unparalleled bumping
ability make him a natural underdog babyface, so I'm leaning more towards Del
Rio winning via nefariousness. That would allow Ziggler to go into SummerSlam as
the challenger again. Then he can win it and reign into the autumn.
I'll probably be happy with whoever wins. This feud has
been great for both men. It should continue into SummerSlam regardless of who's
champ because it's one of the best things going on in WWE right now.
Topping the bill there's the WWE championship match. John
Cena's feud with Mark Henry got off to a strong (and well received) start with
the lauded retirement swerve on the June 17th RAW. Henry dominated
Cena on that show and has dominated him since. On this week's RAW they even
went so far as to tease that Cena can't lift Henry for the AA. That only
happens when WWE are going all out to convince us someone's a threat. Sadly
it's ridiculous because Cena's managed the feat of lifting Henners many times
in the past. That means we can probably look forward to Cena trying and failing
to hit the move throughout their match at Money in the Bank... before he inevitably
does it and the crowd go nuts (and
they will).
I'm surprised a stipulation didn't get added to this.
Neither man excels in regular wrestling matches. Some sort of rule relaxation
would have played to their strengths. There's still time for something to be
announced I suppose, but it doesn't seem likely. At least without a gimmick
they'll be able to focus on telling the story of Cena hefting an overweight man
on to his shoulders. Who doesn't want to see that?!
A win for Mark Henry isn't the most ridiculous prediction
that could be made. He's been built up as Cena's equal and, more importantly,
WWE have displayed a worrying tendency to treat him as a valuable main event
asset over the last few years. I thought him defeating Randy Orton for the
World Heavyweight strap was an impossibility. Look how that played out. I
shan't underestimate WWE's devotion to 'The World's Strongest Man' again.
But just because I recognise the possibility of Henry
winning doesn't mean I think it will happen. Cena is still very much the top
dog, pushed at everyone else's expense. Henry's been built up as a standard
issue Cena challenger: someone big and heavy who can muscle 'The Champ' around
before falling to an AA. This is just a particularly good example of the
standard formula as far as I can see.
Then there's Brock Lesnar.
Don't be surprised if you see 'The Pain' make an
unannounced appearance on this show. It's easy to envisage him stopping Punk
from winning Money in the Bank to move their feud along. They could, in fact,
achieve a similar result simply by playing Lesnar's music. That obviously
wouldn't be as good though as it would deprive us of the chance to see some
hot, hot Lesnar on Punk action.
This year's MITB instalment looks like it will continue
the event's hot streak from previous years. It also looks like it will continue
WWE's recent streak of very good PPV events. If they want to they can start
building towards a spectacular SummerSlam card here. Whether they'll choose to
is a question we won't have answered until next week. But I'm going remain
hopeful.
Predictions
summary:
John Cena to defeat Mark HenryAlberto Del Rio to defeat Dolph Ziggler
Daniel Bryan to win the WWE championship Money in the Bank match
Wade Barrett to win the World Heavyweight championship Money in the Bank match
AJ Lee to defeat Kaitlyn
Ryback to defeat Chris Jericho
Curtis Axel to defeat The Miz
The Shield to defeat The Usos
WWE Money In The Bank 2013 Live Online Streaming http://sportsbun.com/wwe-money-in-the-bank-2013-live-stream/
ReplyDelete