In a sense the company’s stance on indy standouts and veterans
changed when they signed CM Punk. Anyone who’s watched the Best in the World
DVD will know this. It’s spoken about openly there. Punk was going to be let go
at one point because nobody in a position of authority knew what to do with him.
He stayed employed because of Paul Heyman being desperate to use him in WWECW.
Why was he signed to begin with? There’s no obvious answer
to those of us not in the know but I imagine his look, clear understanding of
how to wrestle, and passion stood him in good sted. Once he’d made it to then
developmental league OVW his glowing reputation hindered his progress,
resulting in the near firing. Anyone who’s achieved a level of notoriety before
heading to WWE is essentially a target, the perception of the road agents seeming
to be that the guy will believe in their own hype and only know how to work the
indy style, as opposed to the much vaunted WWE style.
Basically, nobody in WWE expected Punk to become as big
as he has and he was originally signed because certain influential people in
the company (most likely Heyman and Jim Ross) appreciated the potential he had.
I certainly can’t imagine John Laurinaitis had the wherewithal to approach him.
Punk’s success despite WWE’s booking is probably what
made them change their opinion on guys like him. If he could succeed in spite
of efforts to hold him down as a mid-carder then logically there would be a
chance that the guys he came up with on the indies could possess that same
talent. That, I imagine, was the thought process employed by Vince McMahon, Triple
H, and their cadre of advisors.
I could be reading too much into things of course. It’s
true that sooner or later WWE were going to have to sign some of the top stars
from the indies instead of the likes of Gunner Scott, Eric Escobar, Sylvester
Terkay, and Orlando Jordan. Perhaps that point was simply reached and they
decided to sign good guys, rather
than average ones, as opposed to their being some big revelatory moment
revolving around CM Punk.
This brings back happy memories for precisely no one
Bryan became a star for WWE too. Okay, he’s not reached
the heights of Punk and it’s possibly that he never will, but he’s done far
more than anyone thought he would. That’s important. He was given a chance to
do well and proved that he could. He showed that Punk wasn’t an anomaly, that
guys from “the indy generation” (or should that be “the ROH generation”?) could
adapt their approach and get over in The Big Leagues.
The last few years have seen WWE snatching up indy talent
like they’re going out of style. Claudio Castagnoli, Chris Hero, PAC, El
Generico, and Sara Del Rey have all signed up to get a new ring name and take
on various roles within WWE. There’s recently been talk that Mike Bennett and
Sami Callihan are on the cusp of inking developmental deals, and it was
announced on May 26th that Samuray Del Sol has signed a contract.
Please pair this man with Sin Cara. Thanks
This approach is best for everyone involved. WWE gets the
best talent to display on the most watched wrestling shows in the world and the
younger stars just starting out get to prove their capable of following in the footsteps
of their predecessors. It’s almost like the circle of life.
Almost.
Ive got a Wrestlemania 30 prediction for you, tell me what you think:
ReplyDeleteThis is all dependent on Stone Cold not being able to wrestle Punk next year. Winner in ALL CAPS.
WWE Title:
CM PUNK v Lesnar (c)
Cena v UNDERTAKER
Rock v REIGNS
RYBACK v HHH
World Title:
BRYAN v Ziggler (c)
IC Title:
Ambrose (c) v ROLLINS v Jericho
US Title:
SANDOW (c) v Bray Wyatt
Tag Titles:
BIG E/ HENRY (c) v Axel/ Cesaro
Sheamus v ORTON
MITB:
Fandango v Del Rio, BARRET v Rhodes v Big Show v Miz v Kane v Swagger
I think Punk v Lesnar will happen earlier. Possibly SummerSlam. As far as The Streak goes I think Cena will challenge it in Undertaker's last match. As for the rest of the card it's far too early to tell.
Deletehttp://youtu.be/hHW5Q9-gUCA
ReplyDelete