Ambrose’s five week stint on a movie set may have halted his
momentum but it’s also likely that his time away will have made people keen to
see him again. As my old pal Jim Cornette would say, nobody can be missed if
they don’t leave. Absence makes the heart grow fonder and all that.
Ambrose is listed amongst the superstars confirmed for
tomorrow’s episode of Monday Night RAW. That means we can expect to see him on
that show but it doesn’t necessarily mean he’ll be returning there. He could
just as easily show up at this evening’s Night of Champions to gain some
unadvertised retribution on Seth Rollins.
In fact, a Night of Champions appearance seems likelier
than a return on RAW after the news that Roman Reigns has been pulled from the
pay-per-view due to injury and will be out of action for somewhere in the
region of two months. It’s easy to imagine Rollins hitting the ring to have
himself announced the winner of his match with Reigns via forfeit only for ‘The
Lunatic Fringe’ to charge out and give him an impromptu battering. The crowd
would eat that up, it would get the Rollins v Ambrose programme back on track,
and keep Rollins on the pay-per-view. Three wins.
But is that the best course of action for WWE? Personally
I’d like to see them take another route. Have a backstage segment in which The
Authority gloat about Reigns being injured and tell Rollins that he’ll still be
in action, but wrestling for the Intercontinental championship. Or have Rollins
crash Christian’s pre-show Peep Show to make the announcement himself. At the
start of the scheduled Miz versus Ziggler match Rollins could go to the ring
only to sit at commentary, explaining that he’ll face the winner of the IC title match. ‘The Show Off’ could retain and
then lose the title to Rollins immediately afterwards.
Then Ambrose could show up to give the new champ a
kicking.
Give them the Intercontinental title. Both guys and the belt would benefit. |
This would achieve a few things. It would keep up
Rollins’ status as the spoilt chosen one of The Authority: he’d have been handed
a championship match (which the commentary team could put over as unjust) and
beaten a popular guy in unfair circumstances (unjust again, obvs) to win the
gold. It would get the IC belt involved in the company’s hottest and longest
running feud, potentially restoring some of its lustre. It would also set
Ambrose up for a title win at some point in the future, further painting him as
a man destined for the top and again giving the title’s status a boost.
Whether they involve the Intercontinental championship
Ambrose v Rollins is the perfect match to get the Hell in a Cell treatment in
October. The problem with attaching the gimmick to a pay-per-view is that it
doesn’t always sync up with rivalries that are worthy of it. Hell in a Cell, as
WWE’s (in theory) premiere feud-ender, is something that should be built up to
over time and only used for the most serious of grudges. If there’s been any
feud in WWE over the last year that deserves the Cell treatment it’s Ambrose versus
Rollins.
I’m going to hope WWE see sense and book Ambrose and
Rollins to close the Cell PPV inside the cage. Closing a major show would give
both men a credibility boost (and the Intercontinental strap, were that
involved), and Cena could always be slipped into the penultimate spot to combat
concerns of there being a lack of established headliners at the top of the
card. If WWE wants to get new stars over they need to break from their
long-established patterns. Ambrose and Rollins closing Hell in a Cell would do
that.
No comments:
Post a Comment