WWE seems to have forgotten the reason nicknames and
monikers were introduced in the first place. The build up to WrestleMania XXX
saw Triple H telling Batista that if he didn’t rediscover ‘The Animal’ he
didn’t think he’d be able to leave the event as champion. That’s the same
Triple H who promised Daniel Bryan that he’d be facing ‘The Game’ as though
sometimes people face Triple H but not ‘The Game’. Before that we had The
Authority telling Randy Orton to rediscover ‘The Viper’, which was used as
shorthand for his supposed sadistic streak (basically little more than him
punting people in the head, but still).
The return of 'Y2J', apparently. |
The earliest instance of the practice I can recall came in
the summer of 2012. The August 10 episode of SmackDown featured Chris Jericho
announcing that it was time to bring back ‘Y2J’, a signal that the audience
should treat him as a babyface (which they’d been doing anyway). ‘Y2J’ was
intended as his babyface persona, but the moniker had been used for years
beforehand, regardless of whether he was seeking cheers or jeers.
It’s clear from the way in which these nicknames are
being employed by WWE that they are no longer intended as mere nicknames that
add to a wrestler’s character. They are now supposed to be taken as some sort
of totem of power, something that can be gained and lost, switched on and off,
depending on a wrestler’s drive, motivation and success (or something). Which
is something that can work in
wrestling but not in a promotion like WWE.
It does not come across well and it’s something I think
WWE should drop before they go any further with it. A lot of what they’re doing
recently has worked very well but the nicknames as superpowers approach has been
a miss. Nobody has latched onto it and everyone sounds stupid talking about
channelling their inner-nickname. Let nicknames be nicknames and use good
booking to get guys abilities over.
No comments:
Post a Comment