Showing posts with label Christian York. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian York. Show all posts

Thursday, 4 July 2013

The Beginning of the End?

On Wednesday 3rd July TNA announced the release of five wrestlers. They were, in no particular order, Joey Ryan, Crimson, Taeler Hendrix, Christian York and Madison Rayne. Hendrix and Ryan have indicated that they either requested releases or allowed their contracts to expire without seeking new deals.

There have also been some interesting rumours circulating. First, that the WWE Hall of Fame building is going to be built at or near Universal Studios in Orlando. Second, that Sting is interested in a move to WWE, like really interested and he seriously means it this time so don't you doubt him thank you so very much.
 
For the purposes of this post I'm not interested in the prospect of Sting joining WWE. I'm more interested in what the rumour, if true, indicates about TNA's current financial affairs. Obviously it's not a positive sign. 'The Stinger' has been the only major name of yesteryear who has continually backed TNA and attempted to use his (diminishing) star power to help them compete with WWE. It hasn't worked but it's the thought that counts.

If Sting is considering a move there will likely be several factors at play. Age is one. Now in his mid-fifties Sting must realise he's going to have to finish his career soon. He, like every other major wrestling name, would almost certainly love to do so in WWE, where he'd also benefit creatively by having a roster full of fresh opponents.

It also hints at TNA not being able to afford him and encouraging him to make the jump. The reason Crimson and company (there's a kids' TV show waiting to happen) have been let go is apparently part of a drive to streamline the roster and save cash. That in turn is said to be linked to the extra costs TNA's been racking up since they started taping Impact from different locations and putting on more house shows.

Paying Sting to work only a handful of an increasing number of events wouldn't make sense. TNA has clearly been in a position where they need to save money for some time. Encouraging Sting to move on would be an efficient way of doing just that.

The five confirmed releases (Sting leaving is still a rumour remember) further illustrates that TNA is in trouble. Most companies when planning an expanded schedule would seek more talent in order to not overwork their existing roster. Releasing those guys and girls isn't a good move. They may not be draws (Christian York) or even especially wonderful wrestlers (Crimson) but they fill out the roster and perform a clear function as mid-carders and-or enhancers for bigger names (or at least they would have done if they’d been on TV).

The ones who should have been released are Hulk Hogan and Eric Bischoff, who perform no clear function on-screen and have demonstrated during their three and a half years with the league that they don't have any idea how to make it successful, either creatively or financially. I'm as bored of writing that as you are of reading it. They've dodged a bullet again.

This is, of course, terribly bad news for those who have been released. They've lost regular sources of income. In Joey Ryan's case, and to a lesser extent Christian York's, regular televisual exposure has been lost too. That's important to wrestlers who rely on secondary indy bookings to keep their incomes healthy.
 
Why did they release this guy...?

On the plus side Crimson seems like the sort of guy who might get picked up for NXT. Ryan could wind up there too, but ROH and assorted indies seem like a safer bet for him. York will probably return to whatever he did for money before TNA plucked him from wrestling obscurity. Taeler Hendrix will similarly saunter back to the women's indy leagues. And Madison Rayne is engaged with a baby on the way. Her release is a bit of a low blow, but it's understandable to an extent coming as it does from a company that's strapped for cash.

Meanwhile the news that WWE's Hall of Fame might be built at Universal Studios, TNA's home since June 2004, is very interesting. If true it could mean that WWE has indirectly killed TNA by forcing them to spend more money than they can afford on touring Impact around the country. It could either be a big coincidence or an incredibly calculated move to finally put an end to TNA. Conspiracy theorists will favour the latter but why would WWE go to such elaborate bother if their goal was the obliteration of TNA? It would be far more straightforward to offer wrestlers large sums of money whenever they became available.

The alleged Hall of Fame construction site would be much like Vince's territory invasions of the eighties. Only this time a little more literal.

Any feelings that TNA's about to immediately go under can be quelled, for now, by the re-signing of Taz. If TNA was about to go under then securing the services of a spectacularly average colour commentator would not be top of their list of priorities. That they’ve just re-signed him indicates they feel they’ve got a future beyond the next few weeks. The company's in very real trouble, but they're not on their last legs yet.

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

X Additions

TNA needs to do something with its X Division. This is something I've written before (as recently as last week, in fact) but it's worth writing again.

This Thursday's Impact will apparently see new rules announced for the X boys. I'm not aware of what these rules will be but I can't imagine any that could bring about enough change to restore the league to its once lofty heights. Fans don't care too much about the rules governing wrestling. We're even less inclined to care about the rules of a division that's not currently entertaining on any meaningful level.

There's only one thing that I think could improve the X Division. It’s not a new rulebook. It’s new talent.

The X Division, much like the Knockouts division, is an area of the TNA roster that is ridiculously under stocked. The Knockouts at least have a variety of characters in their midst. Nobody's going to confuse a Gail Kim promo with an ODB promo. The same can't be said for the X Division. The heels and the faces all sound the same. Even Zema Ion, once someone who stood out from the pack, has regressed. He's now little more than spray and Dragon Ball Z hair.


Kame hame ha!

What's so frustrating is that when treated properly the X Division is TNA's greatest tool against WWE. Vince McMahon is notoriously reluctant to promote anything resembling the X Division in his company. Look at his half-hearted treatment of the cruiserweight and light heavyweight titles. He's not against promoting smaller guys, but when he does they wrestle a slower, more deliberate style than that seen in the average X bout.

The argument that TNA also has the Knockouts to set them apart from the competition is flimsy. While the KOs used to be great their matches and programmes have slipped in quality like the X Division. More to the point WWE has shown that they are willing to push female performers in the past. Just because they're not right now (mainly because they have about two female performers of note) doesn't mean they're incapable of doing so. The Knockouts are a less unique attribute to TNA than the X Division.

Matches involving Kenny King, Christian York, and Zema Ion can only be cycled through for so long. The reappearance of Sonjay Dutt was nice to see, not to mention welcome, and Rockstar Spud won’t hurt. But they alone can't save the X scene. If the league is to return to the spectacle associated with its heyday two or three other guys need to be brought in to provide fresh bouts.

Right now I can't foresee these new X Division rules being anything but a flimsy substitute for much needed new talent.